This is such an interesting thing to think about. There are a lot of things to be said about the media we transcribe and what that means in today's age where so much is stored in so many ways. I think there's a case to be made about videotaping for the sake of recording moments, versus videotaping for the sake of art or content. To show what happened visually, it has its own pros and cons compared to actual written scripture. Such as leaving behind the thoughts of the recorder verbatim, instead they could be approximated through camera work, but that's really guessing at that point.
I'm sure there are careers and tasks like secretary and the recording of the minutes of meetings and court cases, but I'm not entirely familiar with the scope of that work. I like that the idea of journalism is acting as a scribe for your own experience, and that to be an artist is to record emotion and experience through a certain lens. In a more technical sense, I think speech-to-text is a huge medium for it, and I have a feeling AI will be taking charge in providing description to situations and data through its lens as well. I make research and notes for my local museum, and I think about that influencing other people's research and view on the past, off in the distant future. I think that's being a scribe in a certain way, but I think your post has inspired something for me. Even if they're not important events, maybe I want to make the moments I experience tangible and witness-able in a way. Personally, it feels like anything is worth recording, but obviously some things will be much more practically useful than others. Sciences, medical info, history and Anthropological influences, etc etc. I'm also interested in media preservation, and I believe an extension of that is being a scribe. To be someone who is creating the media to express an event or experience, to then be preserved for the good of the future.