|
|
grubbyfox
Sr. Member ⚓︎
   


forever in 2006 ⛺︎ My Room
SpaceHey: Friend Me!
iMood: 
Artifacts:
|
 |
« Reply #16 on: a Winter day » |
|
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: a Winter night by grubbyfox »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lianna
Casual Poster



unassuming rabbit ⛺︎ My Room
XMPP: Chat!
Artifacts:
|
 |
« Reply #21 on: a Spring day » |
|
I definitely noticed that Google search results went down the drain in the past couple of years when it comes to relevancy and amount of scams. When I started using DuckDuckGo regularly in like, 2018 or so, I regularly had to add on the "!g" search term to be redirected to Google to find some more relevant and obvious links than I would find on DDG. Nowadays, I never have to go to Google to find more relevant results; and if I try, they're just as shite there as they are on the Duck site. That said, I have switched to Marginalia for all recreational web browsing a couple of months ago, and it's been really refreshing how relevant, noncommercial and plainly interesting the results are compared to major search engines. Not only that, but also the amount of additional information about and control you get over the results. Want to find websites published before a certain date? Doable. Want to find similar websites based on where they link? One click away. Want to know the IP, hoster, location of a site? Right there. Want to know where your search term appears on the website exactly? No more guessing and CTRL+F'ing. I still use DuckDuckGo for work and university, because I unfortunately need some of the stuff that Marginalia filters out or does not have crawled. For example, the Digital Dictionary of the German Language (DWDS) is essential for my academic work, but it doesn't show up on Marginalia at all. On the topic of SEO abuse, there's also this interesting experiment/blog article by Danluu directly comparing the quality of results of a bunch of engines.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|