I was looking at my bookmarked links to suggest more sites on the Little Lone Websites thread (
https://forum.melonland.net/index.php?topic=2353.msg23026#msg23026 ) and knew that "Canuck's House Of Kaoanis", a webpage collecting kaoani icon gifs since the mid 00s, would be perfect for the topic. I had found the site a few months ago while looking at several linkout collections and was amazed to find it still up.
When I went to visit it yesterday, I found the webmaster had just finished revamping the site with an "updated" layout, faster loadtimes and collection display. That's good... but now the site looks like this:
http://gocanucks.free.fr/Other than being explicitly coded by AI (you can't miss that huge disclaimer at the bottom) that oily, mistake-ridden generated banner slaps you in the face as soon as you enter.
For context, Wayback Machine has snapshots on how the site looked up until very recently:
https://web.archive.org/web/20250709160443/http://gocanucks.free.fr/So that sucks, but what aggravates it all is that I had added the link to my website as part of my "useful links" collection, and indeed despite the cosmetic change, the site is still providing an enormous source of kaoani GIFs. However, I am extremely anti-AI and having the link on my site makes me feel like I'm indirectly affiliating or endorsing with vibe coding.
What would you do in this situation? Shall I close an eye to the webmaster's choices and keep the link for the sake of its resources? Should I remove it from my collection? Should I instead link to the archiviated version of the site so to not endorse its modern iteration?
Did you have similar experiences of beloved sites suddenly changing and turning so bad you felt inclined leaving them for good? (I mean, that's the experience a lot of people had with DA turning into Eclipse...)