I don't like how gossipy both of these articles are. they're all calling lots of actors the very subjective descriptor of "annoying" in these articles that ask to be seen as credible. and they sprinkle these descriptors in so haphazardly that I just have to wonder, what did they mean by this? am I supposed to discredit the other article because they were annoying? was it necessary that you bring up that this person was annoying in the middle of objective discussion, supposedly to sway my perspective or something?
I think that's just what a hard-to-access community forum gets you. if no one can see direct proof of your actions, you get stuff like these hard-to-confirm articles and this thread. this thread is also gossipy, though I'm not saying it's an immoral one that should be removed. my issue with "gossip" stems with from the fact that anecdotes are hard to confirm. you can't totally believe any claim, be it a positive or negative one, because whatever happened happened in a discord server. unless we bring out the screenshots, but honestly? at that point it starts feeling like childish drama at a high school or something @_@
the closed-off nekoweb community—and I mean inherently closed-off by the nature of its platform—sounds like pure chaos considering how many more articles these two link to. if secondary accounts is all that I can refer to, then I suppose these articles are less for randos like me and more for other nekoweb users, and I'm not missing out on anything by not being in the nekoweb server.
I will say though, for being one of the major faces of the old web revival now (many point to nekoweb as a starting point for people who want to get into the indieweb) I've encountered too many sites on it that does more to regress web culture. deliberately removing basic accessibility features from their site through scripting such as disabling the right-click popup dialogue (presumably to avoid people from looking at its source code), their confused stance on web accessibility, and general hostility towards "copying" which I feel related to that is the community's lack of care for archiving the web (a thread reply discusses the last one
here). I would send links demonstrating these claims but really simply if a site doesn't want me being on it then I simply tab out and forget.