|
|
|
|
|
|
Cele
Hero Member ⚓︎
    

 ⛺︎ My Room
Artifacts:
 
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: a Winter day » |
|
When I explore a web ring, and the next page doesn't have the widget so I can't continue. (Yesterweb+ fixes this for their web ring, but there's nothing for the others)
Also if the next website is broken so you can't continue 
It's annoying if the menu is difficult to find (maybe it doesn't exist?) and then if you click on the menu to go to a different section, the menu disappears so you need to return to the front page with the browser's back button to browse the other links.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
brisray
Hero Member ⚓︎
    

 ⛺︎ My Room
Artifacts:
 
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: a Summer night » |
|
All sorts of things are niggly to me. Some have been already been mentioned
Navigtion that is difficult to use.
Broken webrings - around 2/3 of them end up in a broken link.
Links to other sites that end up trapped in the original site's iframe.
Low contrast between the text and the background.
Parallax Scrolling - They all end up with some massive images, a long wait time to load, some headlines, and nothing of interest. Creative Bloq's "18 beautiful parallax scrolling websites" are all either broken or look crap. The article was only published in April and they may as well have just pointed to W3Schools example page.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: a Summer night by brisray »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
brisray
Hero Member ⚓︎
    

 ⛺︎ My Room
Artifacts:
 
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: a Summer night » |
|
super wide super low-content websites There's more of those appearing than ever.
The web landscape is changing. Google has been doing things to how their search engine works. There were updates in 2022, 2023 and another update in March this year. SEO specialists have been constantly moaning about them. Personally, I think building a business wholly dependent on what another company, which you have absolutely no control over, does might not have been the best business plan.
Something else that have started appearing are page wide banner ads taking up half the length of the page. Those things were crap in the 1990s and are just as nasty now.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Sailor_Fabulous
Casual Poster ⚓︎


 ⛺︎ My Room
Artifacts:

|
 |
« Reply #12 on: a Summer night » |
|
The super-wide low content ones annoy me too! But not just in the shiny new way, or even just low content.
My main gripe is sites that are: full width, too small, or way too justified to one side of the screen or the other. I acknowledge that some part is played by screen width, but I just can't stand opening a page and seeing the text go all the way from the left of the screen to the right when I'm on my laptop or desktop. Obviously fine (and probably preferred) on mobile.
On the opposite of that, I find a lot of old websites (and new ones imitating those) are really really small, right in the middle screen or all the way on one side of the screen and barely taking up half of it. It's just really hard to read and engage with, and probably not great for my eyes or my neck when I have to twist to one side or else de-centre myself. Of course I usually just zoom in if I really want to see the the content of the site, but most of the time I just won't bother.
I also hate when there's a crinkly paper-type texture background and really thin font for the text on it, it's so hard to read!
Lastly I'm not a fan of primarily text-based sites (often linked with those other issues), but I acknowledge that some people are into that, I'm just not likely to stick around.
When these things are on personal websites it's not a big deal because the site is for them, not me, and I can just go elsewhere, but when it's a site where someone is trying to share something and actively wants people to read and engage, I find it really frustrating!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|